Dead Horses and Cans of Worms--and Bats

Ah, now to assumption of risk. Basically, assumption of risk has traditionally be held that "the plaintiff knew before commencing an activity that the activity was dangerous, but chose to participate, anyway." Although this has long-held legal standing, in recent years the definition has narrowed some in that the participant must "fully appreciate" all the potential risks and the possible outcomes. In addition, the athlete must "knowingly, voluntarily, and unequivocally" decide to participate in the face of these risks.

Thus, we get down to players (or/and parents)making an informed decision as to whether to participate. I (and son) choose baseball, knowing full-well the risks invovled. He (although only 10) understands from hanging around college athletics and health care the risks. We sat down and watched the FOX and ESPN shows. Heck, we ALL, until our children or we decide to chuck it, make the decision for expose ourselves, children, and players to risk. That is the nature of all sports. Maybe a radical solution is to hold our kids out of all levels of baseball until the bats are changed. THAT would certainly get the sanctioning bodies' attention. Until then, though, as a result of our continued participation, we remain "co-conspirators" in the bat wars.

Your serve, Wayne. This is fun! JT